RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate cost-effective pharmacological treatment in adult kidney transplant recipients from the perspective of the Colombian health system. METHODS: A decision tree model for the induction phase and a Markov model for the maintenance phase were built. A review of the clinical literature was conducted to extract probabilities, and the life-years were used as the outcome. Costs were calculated using the administrative databases. The evaluating treatment schemes are organized by groups of evidence with direct comparisons. RESULTS: In the induction phase, anti-thymocyte immunoglobulin+ methylprednisolone is dominant, more effective, and less expensive, compared with basiliximab+methylprednisolone. In the maintenance phase, azathioprine (AZA) is dominant in contrast to mycophenolate mofetil (MFM) both with cyclosporine (CIC)+ corticosteroids (CE); CIC is dominant relative to sirolimus (SIR) and tacrolimus (TAC) (both with MFM+CE or AZA+CE), and TAC is dominant compared with SIR (in addition with MFM+CE or mycophenolate sodium [MFS]+CE); MFM is dominant in relation to MFS and everolimus, and SIR is more effective MFM but it does not exceed the threshold (in sum with TAC+CE); MFS and MFM are dominant relative to everolimus, and SIR is more effective than MFM, but it does not exceed the threshold (in addiction with CIC+CE); MFM is dominant in relation to TAC (in sum with SIR+CE), and CIC+AZA+CE is dominant in relation to TAC+MFM+CE. CONCLUSIONS: The base-case results for all evidence groups are consistent with the different sensitivity analyses.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pharmacological treatment in maintenance therapy for adult heart transplant recipients from the Colombian health system perspective. METHODS: We constructed a decision tree model with a 1-year time horizon. A review of the clinical literature was performed to extract probabilities of health events and acute rejections avoided were used as the health outcome. Costs were calculated from the base-case approximation and were obtained from administrative databases in Colombia (Sistema de Información de Precios de Medicamentos 2020 and Suficiencia 2012-2019), and the prices were adjusted to US dollar 2021. RESULTS: Two evaluation results were presented. The first evaluates the tacrolimus + azathioprine + corticosteroid (TAC) scheme compared with cyclosporine + azathioprine + corticosteroid (CAC), in which the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio indicates that 1 additional rejection avoided has a cost of US dollar $5461.09 which, compared with the cost-effectiveness threshold in the base case, indicates that the TAC scheme is not a cost-effective (CE) strategy with respect to the CAC scheme. The second result shows the comparison of tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil + corticosteroid (TMC) with cyclosporine + mycophenolate mofetil + corticosteroid (CMC) in which TMC was found to be a dominant alternative to CMC. CONCLUSIONS: The tacrolimus-based immunosuppression scheme is not CE in its TAC scheme, versus CAC, and is dominant in its TMC scheme, versus CMC, sensitivity analyses show that tacrolimus could become a CE alternative in any scheme used against higher cost-effectiveness threshold.
